History of Mechanics Rewritten: Islamic Golden Age to Newtonian Synthesis

Authors

https://doi.org/10.48314/nex.vi.29

Abstract

The standard account of the Scientific Revolution follows a gradual, Eurocentric trajectory from Copernicus to Newton, who ultimately developed the laws of mechanics in his Principia Mathematica.  This history, while celebrating a monumental accomplishment, often omits the vital intellectual underpinnings established centuries ago. Challenging this truncated history, this essay contends that the conceptual underpinnings of Newtonian mechanics—specifically the concepts of inertia, acceleration, and gravitational attraction—were not generated ex nihilo in 17th-century Europe. This article will show that by studying the work of thinkers like Ibn Sina, Ibn al-Haytham, Abu'l-Barakat al-Baghdaadi, and al-Khazini, they not only preserved Greek science but also critically challenged and enhanced it, creating precursor ideas to inertia and gravity. It will next follow the spread of these ideas into medieval Europe, where they directly affected the philosophers who set the groundwork for Galileo and finally Newton. Newton's synthesis requires acknowledging the crucial contributions of the Islamic scientific tradition, which have been overlooked, and therefore, mechanics is not considered an "Arabic innovation" in the modern sense.

Keywords:

Mechanics, Principia mathematica, Islamic golden age, History, Medieval Europe

References

  1. [1] Newton, I. (1833). Philosophiae naturalis principia mathematica. G. Brookman. https://B2n.ir/wx2545
  2. [2] Mageed, I. A. (2025). Does infinity exist- crossroads between mathematics, physics, and philosophy. http://dx.doi.org/10.20944/preprints202506.2056.v1
  3. [3] Mageed, I. A. (2025). The Islamization of mathematics-a philosophical and pedagogical inquiry. http://dx.doi.org/10.20944/preprints202506.2451.v1
  4. [4] Shioyama, T. (2021). Newton. Faraday. Einstein: From classical physics to modern physics. World Scientific. https://B2n.ir/sm5019
  5. [5] Iqbal, M. (2018). Islam and science. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315195698
  6. [6] Straface, A. (2020). Abū Bakr al-Rāzī, Muḥammad ibn Zakarīyāʾ (Rhazes). In Encyclopedia of medieval philosophy: Philosophy between 500 and 1500 (pp. 18–22). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1665-7_5
  7. [7] Morgan, D. L. (2022). Robert merton and the history of focus groups: Standing on the shoulders of a giant? The American sociologist, 53(3), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-021-09500-5
  8. [8] Eamon, W. (2020). Science and the secrets of nature: Books of secrets in medieval and early modern culture. Princeton University Press. https://www.torrossa.com/en/resources/an/5622774
  9. [9] Marrone, S. (2022). The light of thy countenance: Science and knowledge of God in the thirteenth century: Volume Two. Brill. https://B2n.ir/wz1661
  10. [10] Gutas, D. (2023). Hellenic philosophy, Arabic and syriac reception of. In Oxford classical dictionary. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199381135.013.8170
  11. [11] Desaguliers, J. T. (1723). Animadversions upon some experiments relating to the force of moving bodies; with two new experiments on the same subject. Philosophical transactions of the royal society of london, 32(376), 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstl.1722.0052
  12. [12] Walley, S. M. (2018). Aristotle, projectiles and guns. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1804.00716
  13. [13] Arabi, I. (2023). Les Illuminations de La Mecque. In Les secrets du jeûne (pp. 45–58). Paris: Éditions i. https://shs.cairn.info/article/EDI_IBNAR_2023_04_0045
  14. [14] Marcotte, R. D. (2020). Abū L-Barakāt al-Baġdādī. In Encyclopedia of medieval philosophy: Philosophy between 500 and 1500 (pp. 31–38). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9729-4_6
  15. [15] Drake, S. (1993). Galileo. In Cosmology. CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003418047
  16. [16] Gari, L., & Abattouy, M. (2008). Abu ‘l-Barakat al-Baghdadi: Outline of a non-Aristotelian natural philosophy. https://muslimheritage.com/abu-l-barakat-al-baghdadi-aristotelian-philosophy/
  17. [17] Abrahamov, B. (2019). Islamic theology: Traditionalism and rationalism. Edinburgh University Press. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/9781474463782/html
  18. [18] Christie, J. R. R. (2020). The development of the historiography of science. In Companion to the history of modern science (pp. 5–22). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003070818
  19. [19] Setiawan, A. R. (2022). Six rhetoric quadratic: The six types of quadratic equations presented by abū ja’far muḥammad ibn mūsā al-khwārizmī in al-kitāb al-mukhtaṣor fī ḥisāb al-jabr wa al-muqōbala. https://osf.io/preprints/thesiscommons/3psu2_v1
  20. [20] Rashed, R. (2019). Encyclopedia of the history of Arabic science. Routledge. https://B2n.ir/yp2881
  21. [21] Tbakhi, A., & Amr, S. S. (2007). Ibn Al-Haytham: Father of modern optics. Annals of saudi medicine, 27(6), 464–467. https://doi.org/10.5144/0256-4947.2007.464
  22. [22] Raynaud, D. (2016). Critical edition of Ibn Al-Haytham’s on the shape of the eclipse. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47991-0
  23. [23] Bakalla, M. H. (2023). Arabic culture: through its language and literature. Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003402503
  24. [24] Pascucci, A. (2024). Probability theory. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63190-0
  25. [25] Sinclair, M. (1923). The nature of the evidence. Fortnightly, 113(677), 871–879. https://www.proquest.com/openview/f777dc7319816543/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=14004
  26. [26] Dear, P. (2018). Revolutionizing the sciences: European knowledge in transition, 1500-1700. Bloomsbury Publishing. https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/revolutionizing-the-sciences-9781352003130/
  27. [27] Sissa, G. (2021). Mille facesse iocos! Mètis. anthropologie des mondes grecs anciens, 147–165. https://hal.science/hal-03708858/
  28. [28] Drake, S. (2003). Galileo at work: His scientific biography. Courier Corporation. https://B2n.ir/qk1534
  29. [29] Gleick, J. (2025). Isaac Newton: Un destin fabuleux. Dunod. https://B2n.ir/xs8236
  30. [30] Sharma, P. (2021). The mind: A way towards the perfection of powers of our mind and life with a 13 year old. Preyas Sharma. https://B2n.ir/mx3753
  31. [31] Long, D. P. (2022). John henry newman, doctrinal development, and the canonical status of the theologian in the church [Thesis]. https://www.proquest.com/openview/59783cd3e6aed0c07a246d5bce660d70/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y
  32. [32] Isadora, M. (2022). On hooke’s rule of nature. History of science and technology, 12(2), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.32703/2415-7422-2022-12-2-249-261
  33. [33] Finocchiaro, M. A. (2021). Koyré’s Études galiléennes: Critical reasoning vs. A priori rationalism. In Science, method, and argument in galileo: philosophical, historical, and historiographical essays (pp. 369–388). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77147-8_19
  34. [34] Agostini, C. de S., Silveira, I. P. da, & Polla, C. C. (2021). Scientific evolution of philosophical concepts of the origins of universe and life. Revista archai, (31), e03116. https://doi.org/10.14195/1984-249X_31_16
  35. [35] Medawar, P. B. (2021). The art of the soluble. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003221036

Published

2025-09-28

Issue

Articles in Press

Section

Articles

How to Cite

A Mageed, I. . (2025). History of Mechanics Rewritten: Islamic Golden Age to Newtonian Synthesis. Psychology Nexus. https://doi.org/10.48314/nex.vi.29